論被告人之證明責任

論被告人之證明責任

摘   要

根據無罪推定原則，在刑事訴訟中公訴案件由公訴人承擔證明責任，被告人不負證明責任，自訴案件由自訴人承擔證明責任，被告人不負證明責任；但在刑事訴訟的特殊規則情況下，刑事訴訟證明責任發生轉移，證明責任倒置，如：被告人獨知的事實、被告的某些積極抗辯主張和主張的程序性事實。就此，被告人應承擔部分證明責任。同時，在刑事訴訟案件中由被告人承擔部分證明責任，不僅符合被告人利益，也是符合訴訟效益以及保障人權的考慮的。

關鍵詞：證明責任；無罪推定；優勢證據

ABSTRACT

Basis is pure assume , in criminal contentious case the case of public prosecution is by public prosecutor undertake quilt and the responsibility of proof plaintiff does not undertake the burden of proof, since telling case from since telling person to undertake the burden of proof, quilt plaintiff does not undertake the burden of proof; But under the condition of special rule, the responsibility of criminal lawsuit proof occurs the responsibility of transfer and proof to occur to place upside down , if: The quilt and fact known alone by plaintiff the program fact of view and some positive counterplea views of plaintiff. For this be undertaken by plaintiff partially the burden of proof. At the same time, in criminal contentious case from quilt plaintiff undertakes the partial burden of proof, is not only accord with defendant person benefit, is also accord with lawsuit benifit as well as guarantee the consideration of human rights.

Keyword: burden of proof; presumption of innocence; preponderance of evidence
..............................
注：【包括：畢業論文，任務書，開題報告】

【論被告人之證明責任】相關文章：

論刑事訴訟中的證明責任和舉證責任11-22

論刑證據的質證方式與被告人權利的保護03-07

論適航責任03-18

故意責任論12-08

論李白之“氣”03-27

論體育之美學02-27

論民事之訴03-20

論公益訴訟之價值11-29

論《左傳》之性質及其與《國語》之關系08-16