亚洲一级电影在线观看,九九精品无码专区免费,亚洲AV无码资源在线观看 ,欧美国产高清

ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案

時間:2024-10-09 02:02:17 ACCA 我要投稿
  • 相關推薦

2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

  Question:

2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》精選試題及答案

  Apt Ltd is a small independent book company, which specialises in publishing modern poetry. In January 2013 itsigned a contract with a new poet, called Bel, to publish her second book of poems in August 2014. In March 2013, Bel won a prestigious award for her first book of poems, which had been published privately.

  In the light of the fame which now attached to Bel, Apt Ltd launched an extensive advertising campaign publicising the forthcoming book. The campaign was expensive, costing £50,000, but it was successful in generating great interest. As a result, Apt Ltd won a contract to supply a large book club with 100,000 copies of the book, which would make them a profit of £250,000.

  Unfortunately in May 2014, Bel informed Apt Ltd that she would not be able to supply the manuscript to it as she had signed a more rewarding contract with Cax plc, a very large publishing company.

  Required:

  In the context of Bel’s anticipatory breach of contract, explain any possible remedies open to Apt Ltd.

  Answer:

  The essential issues to be disentangled from the problem scenario relate to breach of contract and the remedies available for such breach.

  There is clearly a binding contractual agreement between Art Ltd and Bel, which Bel has stated she intends to break. Normally breach of a contract occurs where one of the parties to the agreement fails to comply, either completely or satisfactorily, with their obligations under it. However, such a definition does not appear to apply in this case as the time has not yet come when Bel has to produce the manuscript. She has merely indicated that she has no intention of doing so. This is an example of the operation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach. This arises precisely where one party, prior to the actual due date of performance, demonstrates an intention not to perform their contractual obligations. The intention not to fulfil the contract can be either express or implied.

  Express anticipatory breach occurs where a party actually states that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Hochster v De La Tour (1853)). Implied anticipatory breach occurs where a party carries out some act which makes performance impossible (Omnium Enterprises v Sutherland (1919)).

  When anticipatory breach takes place, the innocent party can sue for damages immediately on receipt of the notification of the other party’s intention to repudiate the contract, without waiting for the actual contractual date of performance as in Hochster v De La Tour. Alternatively, they can wait until the actual time for performance before taking action. In the latter instance, they are entitled to make preparations for performance, and claim the agreed contract price (White and Carter (Councils) v McGregor (1961)).

  It would appear that Bel’s action is clearly an instance of express anticipatory breach and that Art Ltd has the right either to accept the repudiation immediately, or affirm the contract and take action against Bel at the time for performance (Vitol SA v Norelf Ltd (1996)). In any event, Bel is bound to complete her contractual promise or suffer the consequences of her breach of contract.

  Remedies for breach of contract

  (i) Specific performance

  It will sometimes suit a party to break their contractual obligations, even if they have to pay damages. In such circumstances, the court can make an order for specific performance to require the party in breach to complete their part of the contract. However, as specific performance is not available in respect of contracts of employment or personal service, Bel cannot be legally required to provide the manuscript to Apt Ltd (Ryan v Mutual Tontine Westminster Chambers Association (1893)). This means that the only remedy against Bel lies in the award of damages.

  (ii) Damages

  A breach of contract will result in the innocent party being able to sue for damages. Apt Ltd, therefore, can sue Bel for damages, but the important issue relates to the extent of such damages.

【ACCA《公司法與商法》試題及答案】相關文章:

ACCA《公司法與商法》真題及答案09-22

2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》訓練試題03-19

2015年ACCA《公司法與商法》練習試題03-19

《論語》試題及答案04-19

為什么要考ACCA?答案就這么簡單......03-20

acca待遇如何?acca收入多少?03-20

Indesign認證試題及答案03-17

excel操作試題及答案03-19

photoshop試題附答案07-15

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久久青草线综合超碰| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽超碰97| 日本无码人妻丰满熟妇区| 肇东市| 日韩AV在线网址观看| 97超碰人人人人人人少妇| 欧美国产视频| 欧美亚洲国产视频| 欧洲熟妇精品视频| 亚洲一区无码精品色| 污污内射久久一区二区欧美日韩| 女m羞辱调教视频网站| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品app| 久久精品一偷一偷国产 | 辉县市| 91麻豆久久久| 久热爱精品视频线路一| 波多野结衣av在线无码中文18| 欧美牲交a欧美牲交aⅴ图片| 未满十四周岁A毛片在线| 国产毛片久久国产| 国产产无码乱码精品久久鸭| 老熟妇高潮一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久国产精品| 精品少妇一区二区三区免费观| 亚洲S久久久久一区二区| 中文字幕无码精品亚洲35| 毛片内射-百度| 天天摸夜夜添夜夜无码| 欧美精品亚洲日韩a| 日韩精品自拍| 亚洲仺av香蕉久久| 国产毛片一区二区精品| 午夜不卡无码中文字幕影院| 出国| 国产精品免费麻豆入口| 激情欧美成人小说在线视频| 亚洲高清国产拍精品熟女| 狠狠综合久久久久尤物| 狠狠色成人综合首页| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区综合部|